ホーキング教授への手紙Ⅱ（資料）


MY LETTER of 15th 12, 1993

戻る

作成日　2002/12/19

Dear Sir:

I knew that you had received my letter of 17th 12,1992 by post card on Saturday,9th January,1993. Thank you very much for the acknowledgement of my letter. If I was ill-mannered to you in the previous letters, excuse me. I did my best in the previous letter, but I wrote a immature style. I insisted that time was divided into two ; one was subjectivetime, the other objective time, and that there was objective time inside subject in materialism, so that objective time was really subjective .


I will outline the previous letter.


Recognizing being just as it is and recognizing being as motion are subjective, not being itself. Recognizing being is impossible without subject.


The state of being at the point of the present is quite different from the state of being at the present. The state of being at the point of the present is absolute motionlessness, but the state of being at the present is moving, not absolute motionlessness. We can't strictly recognize the state of being at the present by a point of time. Not recognizing the state of being at a point of time is essential to the strict recognizing of the state of being at the present, so that points of time are needless for the purpose of strictly recognizing the state of being at the present. The state of being at the present is the natural state of being. The natural state of being is moving. Objective reality at the present is being. Being doesn't move by the passing of time. Being moves by itself. Being includes moving. In short, objective time is needless for the purpose of recognizing being just as it is. In case that we recognize being just as it is, being and moving are the same as far as the state of being at the present is not absolute motionlessness. In case that we recognize being at a point of time, the state of being at a point time is absolute motionlessness. The point of time must go tothe next point of time so that being can move. Recognizing being at a point of time, we can understand that being moves by the passing of time. In short, objective time is necessary for the purpose of recognizing being at a point of time. We recognize being at a point of time in case of motion, so objective time is necessary in case of motion. Objective time is subjective because the necessity of objective time changes by the way of recognizing being.


Position is not objective reality. Position is born in subject by recognizing, not real. Position has no quantity out of subject.




The contents of the previous letter didn't belong to the category of physics, but objective time belongs to the category of physics. I think that the philosophical consider about time is not nonsense for physics.



I wrote the previous letter from a materialistic standpoint. I wrote this letter from a materialistic standpoint,too. I didn't write about the past in the previous letter. I wrote about thepast in this letter.



I will outline the contents of this letter.




Objective reality at a point of the past is not objective reality. Only objective reality at the present is objective reality. Only objective reality at the present is being. Objective reality and being are the same. Memories are not born by objective realities at a point of the past. Memories are not the bases of objective realities at a point of the past.




The table of contents in “Materialistic time (objective time)”

Chapter 1. Preface
Chapter 2. The past
2. 1. ‘Phenomenon’and ‘the base of the past’in realism
2. 2. ‘Cognition and memory’and ‘the base of the past’
in realism
Chapter 3. From realism to materialism
3. 1. ‘Force’
3. 2. ‘Space’
3. 3. ‘Matter’and ‘force’, ‘space’and ‘force’
Chapter 4. Position
Chapter 5. The present and a point of time
Chapter 6. Clock
Chapter 7. Realism where only idealism holds true
Chapter 8. Conclusion


I hope you will read it.



Sincerely,




ご意見ご感想等ありましたら下記へメールをください。
asanami@mxb.mesh.ne.jp


戻る